So Al Qaeda has crudely sawn through the neck of Paul Johnson, Jr.
Allah must indeed be infinitely merciful, because they have called out His name while they did this, and yet they continue to live and breathe.
What can be said? What can a person say to such behavior? Words like "brutality", "madness", and "barbarism" just fail to encompass the horror and the wrongness of what these people are doing. They've pushed a helpless man onto the floor, and used a dull machete to gouge their way through the man's neck.
There are no circumstances around this. Even the suggestion that it could be rationalized, explained, or justified is an insult to this man's pain and his family's mortifying horror. It doesn't matter what came before, and nothing positive can come hereafter. The people who've done this have placed themselves into a category of mankind for which the concept of a hell was first created.
Nick Berg, Paul Johnson. Berg was apparently trying to be a humanitarian. Johnson was apparently just trying to earn a living. Were these men wise? Had they thought through their choices? It doesn't matter. Whether they were wise or reckless, it doesn't matter. Because you can't justify this act.
Imagine if these, what word suits? Monsters? Barbarians? Thugs? Whatever - Imagine if the Al Qaeda terrorists had actually had some connection, however tenuous, to Allah and Islam. Imagine if they'd had, in essence, even the merest shred of humanity and common sense.
They could have let him go.
They could have made noises. They could have threatened future horrors. They could have taken Abu Ghraib-style humiliating photos of him, or painted him blue, or forced him to read a confession.
But they could have let him go.
They could have shown mercy. They could have claimed compassion. They could have, in the end, actually ACTED LIKE MUSLIMS. Angry, pissed-off Muslims on a warpath, but Muslims.
But. No.
Allah was shouting at them, but they plugged their ears. They could have elicited something other than raw digust from the world, but they decided the high road was not satisfying enough for their hatred and titillation. (Because you know that they do this because they enjoy it, you know they don't face this murder as a grim duty but as an exercise of their throbbing idea of machismo.)
No they shook with anticipation as they agreed who would hold the man down, who would point the camera, and who would take the machete and start sawing at his neck while he screamed in helpless agony. Afterwards they thrilled with the memory of their twisted "power," while further cretinous peers edited the video and prepared to put it on the Internet. And still others greedily loaded and watched this horror, and wondered how to turn it to their advantage.
What can you say in the face of such monstrosity? Yes there are other bad things happening in the world. I don't attempt to explain, explore or address them. When we contemplate how these brutal events are connected, we start justifying the unjustifiable. Events like this, like 9/11, like the murder of Nick Berg or any of the travesties and nightmares visited by this or any other nation upon the innocents of the world, these events need to be considered alone, and out of context, even as they need to be understood in a broader context as a means of preventing their repeat.
Whatever the history of these terrorists, whatever their backgrounds, whatever their hopes and dreams or lack thereof, they each were faced today with a choice: whether to commit an irrevocably foul and heinous act, or whether to live by the tenets of their faith and act as actual men of honor towards another man.
They chose. They each decided to do this most loathesome thing. However they rationalized it and justified it, they each know in their hearts that they are damned for their choice, however deeply they shove that knowledge down.
What can anyone say to that? What can anyone do?
Posted by Albatross at June 18, 2004 3:47 PMBob,
I think that you're looking for gray in a black and white situation. They are what they have chosen to become and must be dealt with as such. The why can be discussed by people who study the human condition, but these murderers don't care about that and are not seeking therapy for what they did.
And just as a matter of curiousity, for a man professing atheism why do you refer to damnation in the case of these killers? You don't believe in it, so why mention it and the killers must believe that they will not be damned assuming that it was their religious fervor that brought on this attack.
Brad
Posted by: Brad at June 21, 2004 7:53 PMA comment? Weird. Who knew anyone was reading this thing? Shouldn't you be working? ;-)
I'm using theological language because the [adjectives fail me] murderers are using theological language - I'm not Muslim, either, but I use Muslim terminology. From an atheistic point of view, they are hopeless, delusional self-justifying madmen: from their point of view, they are grandiose heroic underdogs whose behavior is somehow justifiable. My response to them is that within their framework, they are wrong. They don't give a fuck about my framework, so I cast the argument in theirs. Their "Allah" is not the "Allah" of any other Muslim. Their heroic paradise is every other Muslim's damnation. What they are doing is a base wrong, even in their own framework, and at some level they know it.
I'm not looking for gray in a black and white situation. Indeed I think I stressed that there is no gray here - that contexts and circumstances do not and can not lighten the blackness of this issue. These men butchered a living man - no contexts apply.
I'm not so pleased that so many of them have been killed -- killing them accomplishes a little, but not a lot. What we need to do is prevent their being replaced.
Posted by: Albatross at June 21, 2004 9:25 PM I guess I've been reading this for a few months now. I like to read a Minnesotan's point of view. Kind of makes me homesick.
I'll keep reading if you'll keep writing. And I'll comment when I can.
Brad
Jumpin' jiminy there's more of 'em! Granted this is up on the Web and all, but finding out people are actually reading this thing is like finding out that while you're away at work people are touring your bedroom: you'd want to clean it up a little!
Welcome, welcome! Don't mind the mess. (Cripes, I got a lotta cleaning up to do if people are drifting through here...)
So where are you (able to tell us you're) stationed, Brad?
Posted by: Albatross at June 22, 2004 8:20 PMI've long said that people create God in their own image and then turn that ego trip around and say they are created in God's image. I'm an atheist and think it's nuts. The people who commit these sort of acts have a very ugly God and, by my theory, are therefore very ugly people themselves.
Thanks for your thoughts, Bob.
Posted by: Richard at June 23, 2004 8:20 AM